Page 9

   

Myth, Magic and Madness

   


   

   Hekate's Temple

For All Your Questions on Things Pagan and Magical

Iphegenia,
Here goes. I haven't said this to anyone before but I am Christian and I am Pagan. I have spent my life as a Christian, yet in many ways I feel I am lying to myself and my God as there are so many ways in which I am not a Christian. I believe that Jesus the Son and God the Father are aspects of the Infinite Divine rather than the One God. I believe that Wicca is as valid a way to salvation as Evangelical Christianity. I follow the Christian path because the teachings of Jesus resonate for me – although a lot of the other added on bits later don't. But I also celebrate the Eight Festivals of the Wheel, and hold Sabbats and Esbats. It's just that my God is Jesus/Yahweh, and my Goddess is Mary. But everyone tells me I am wrong. That I can't be Pagan if I worship Jesus, and I'm doomed to Hell as a Christian if I celebrate Pagan festivals. Am I crazy? It feels right, yet I feel so alone.
Kerrie

Dear Kerrie,
it sounds like you follow a Christo-Pagan path, one growing in popularity as Christians turn away from the Evangelical, one true path style of worship and seek out a less exclusive, more inclusive way to the Divine. For many it is a safer more comforting choice as it supports them in their preference for Christian language and ritual, while enabling them to seek a communal path that truly accepts the faiths of others. This is not to say that christianity cannot accept other faiths as "true", but there is a tendency to deny other paths that is often overwhelming.

The interesting thing is that Christo-Paganism was the earliest form of Christianity among many of our ancestors. Christianity did not just appear and the world converted. There were centuries where the common people - and even heads of state - worshipped their old gods side-by-side with Jesus. And it was not frowned upon. Discouraged, yes, but not considered worthy of damnation. That had to wait until nasty events such as the Inquisition when power mad Church men began to dominate the world. Yet another indicator as to why Church and State needed to be seperated. You are practicing a very old form of worship. I would recommend you do some research and track down an online group if there are no real-life ones near you. Support and understanding will go a long way to helping you feel less alone.

As for those Pagans who would criticise you, I'd be inclined to remind them that for a good 5-700 years or so Christo-Paganism was a perfectly acceptable method of worship. If it was good enough for the ancestors - the same ancestors in whom they place so much trust, it should be good enough for them! In many cases the texts we rely upon to show us what they old ones believed were written by Christo-Pagans. Let they shove that in their sage and smudge it!

I have listed a few websites you might find of use:

   Christopagan.net
   Christo-Pagan Webring
   Christo-Hellenic synthesis
   Christopaganism

Iphigeneia, Crone of Hekate
   


   

Iphegenia,
What's the deal with love spells being wrong? How is it wrong to find true love?
Shelby

Shelby,
The age old question - how can it be wrong to bring love into the heart of another? The reasoning behind the "wrongness" of love spells is not that they bring love into being, but rather that they don't. Magic is incapable of creating emotional response. It can open gateways enabling emotions to be released. It can block emotions. It can mimic them. But it cannot create them. A love spell is thus a misnomer.

From the practical side, casting a "love" spell to make another fall in love with you is working to "make" that person do your will. You are controlling action, not emotion. The person you cast the spell upon is not in love, simply acting that way - think of it as teaching a dog to perform. Casting the spell is the same as saying "Sit!" - if your Will is strong enough and the dog trained, it will sit. Likewise, with a human, if your Will is strong enough and the person susceptible to suggestion, s/he will obey and act "in love". The moment your Will is relaxed, however, s/he may cease being obedient - just as that sitting dog is likely to get up and walk away if you stop watching it.

The end result is that you need to be concentrating and aware at all times to maintain the strength of the spell. The person it is cast upon will subconsciously fight it - being the orney critters we humans are, we tend to dislike being forced into relationships! And you will never ever know if s/he is with you for any reason other than that you commanded it. This tends to create feelings of insecurity and resentment - not to mention suspicion and jealousy. Love spells do not preclude people from falling in love either. And being in love creates powerful magic - strong enough to break spells.

Morally and ethically, I disagree with love spells - I do not think controlling the will of others is a good thing. However, the line of what is right and what is wrong varies vastly from person to person. Not all paths see domination over others as a bad thing. If that is your path, then you will walk it no matter what I say. Just be aware that doing so does increase your own vulnerability to many things. Such paths often breed suspicion and distrust in those who walk them, and these things weaken the Will.

If you truly want love, the best spell to cast is one that focuses upon you - awaken your senses, cleanse negativity from your life, know yourself. Cast a spell to draw love and friendship into your life - without a target. Leave it open and be receptive. You are more likely to find the right person and experience true love!

Iphigeneia, Crone of Hekate
   


   


   

"Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods."
~ Albert Einstein

   
   

Playing at Paganism
   


Botanical Gardens

   

   By Axiom

I have been wondering about the growing numbers of Pagan-lite Pagans appearing all over the place. At one time the only people you ran across who called themselves Pagan were serious Pagans - they studied (at least to some degree) and took their faith as an active choice which required more than lip-service. Not all were "out", but all were serious enough about their faith and beliefs that is was only a matter of time until that changed.

They had opinions on Pagan topics - which they could back up with research and argument. They were interested in meeting other Pagans to exchange ideas and learn.

They were excited about their faith - with not only a certain delirious joy, but also a deep, solid contentment arising from a confidence in self and path. They believed so utterly that you couldn't fail but feel it.

I still see these people today - meet them, talk with them, learn about them. Some are so new they've yet to pass their first year marker, others so long-standing they've grown moss. But increasingly I have to wade through the Paganlites to find them.

Paganlite. Apt description I think. Lite being the commercially acceptable term to use for products that aren't "really" light in fat or sugar or whatever - thus the use of lite rather than light - but want to seem so. Reminds me of quite a number of the Pagans I meet these days.

Some fall under the Fluffy Bunny umbrella, but not all. I am bumping into more and more people who've put a bit of effort into learning their chosen brand of Paganism. They walk the walk, talk the talk, and chant the chant. They know their marjoram from their marigolds, their Wicca from their Picts. And yet something isn't right.

The belief is lacking - although it's easy to miss while being dazzled with the arcane knowledge, the easy grasp of Herbalism 1700, the radiant energy use. But link up with one of them, or sit and talk awhile, and you start to realize something is badly lacking. You may be less fluent in your Old Latin, and less evocative in your description of the Goddess you worship, but suddenly that's not what you're aware of. It's the emptiness into which your words are falling. Pebbles dropped down a mineshaft that just…vanish. Not echo. No noise. No return.

These Paganlites remind me of the various mainstreamers we run into - you know the ones. They walk the walk and talk the talk of their faith. They even attend a regular service. Do all the right things - but something in the way they speak and act screams out the lack of belief.

Have we become mainstream enough to be developing the hypocritical believer syndrome? I hope not. Because I fear these more than the Fluffy Bunnies and Charmed-Wannabees. The RPGamers who bring their fantasy world with them into their faith - hey, at least they believe. But a Paganlite? What does such a person teach others? We have a hard enough battle convincing the world our resurrected belief systems are valid without these non-believers wandering around pretending to believe.

And don't misunderstand me here - it's not the lack of belief that upsets me. Secular Paganism is a very valid path, as is Pantheistic Paganism. Seeing an old religion as a series of symbols for the human condition, as a metaphor to be used in the search for spiritual growth is just another path - no more right or wrong than any other.

No, it's not the lack of belief, but the pretense of it. The lip service. If seeing such hypocritical behaviour in other faiths riles so many of us so regularly, clearly we as a group feel strongly about pretense of faith. Maybe it arises from the large number of Pagans who "escaped" other faith systems - who spent time paying lip service while they worked out who and what they were. People who eventually couldn't live the lie any longer and converted. Maybe it arise from the numbers who are still living a lie, partially anyway, unable to "come or" to family or friends for fear of ostracisation or worse.

Maybe it's something else entirely. The thing is, just as we find it relatively easy to identify the unbelieving believers outside our faith, so to will non-Pagans pick out the Paganlites without any difficulty. And, again just as we find it hard to not see such behaviour as indicative of flaws within the faith itself, so to will those outsiders looking at Paganism.

We can't afford lite Paganism - the threat it presents for acceptance of us and our beliefs is insidious and passive. Hard to fight.

I don't have any suggestions or solutions. Only questions and fears. But I believe that awareness of the issue, maybe even a steering of such people towards secular practice, is crucial to the health of Paganism as a whole.
   

"At ebb tide I wrote a line upon the sand, and gave it all my heart and all my soul. At flood tide I returned to read what I had inscribed and found my ignorance upon the shore."
~ Kahlil Gibran

   


   


   

Unless otherwise indicated, all photographs are provided by and the property of the person submitting the article. Any artwork, images, photography, poetry, spells, rituals, or other written work displayed in this magazine remains the property of the owner of said work, and all copyrights are to be upheld. Beyond that, this magazine does not lay claim of ownership to any work not created by the magazine, and does not support plagiarism or theft. Should you find your work in this magazine incorrectly credited, please contact the Web Designer with details so it can be rectified immediately.
   



   

Are you interested in submitting letters or articles to the Tools of the Trade Division? If so, please read the Submissions Guidelines.
They offer details on deadlines and the staff to contact.

Our Editorial staff are also happy to answer questions.

   

Editorial Division

Festivals & Holidays

Rituals & Activities

Kitchen Witchery

Tools of the Trade

Pagan Families

Archive Page

Calendar of Observances

Submissions Guide

The Library

The FAQ

NEXT PAGE
Pagan Thought Page 10